The 7-Step Metal Powder Bed Fusion Patent Strategy I Wish I Knew Before Wasting $100k
Let's be honest. You didn't get into additive manufacturing (AM) to read legal documents. You got into it because of the magic. That spine-tingling moment when you pull a complex, impossible-looking metal part out of a bed of powder. It's engineering, alchemy, and science fiction all rolled into one.
You’ve probably just leased or bought your first metal Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) machine—maybe a Laser PBF (LPBF) like an EOS or SLM, or maybe an Electron Beam (EBM) like an Arcam. You’re running test builds, dialing in parameters for Inconel or Titanium, and dreaming about disrupting aerospace, medical devices, or high-performance automotive.
And then, you have a thought. A cold, prickly thought that crawls up your neck right as you’re celebrating a successful build:
"Wait... can I... legally... do this?"
Or maybe: "This new support structure I designed... it's brilliant. It cuts post-processing by 50%. Could someone just steal it?"
Welcome to the multi-million-dollar minefield of metal powder bed fusion patent strategy. I've been in the rooms where these conversations happen—rooms where founders are either celebrating a "picket fence" of patents that just secured their Series B funding, or rooms where they're staring at a cease-and-desist letter from a competitor that threatens to shut them down.
The patent landscape for PBF is messy. For decades, a few giants (like EOS and Arcam) held the foundational patents, making the space incredibly expensive to enter. Then, around 2014-2016, a lot of those core patents expired. The gates flew open, new machine-makers flooded the market, and prices dropped. It was a gold rush.
But here’s the trap everyone falls into: just because the basic idea of melting powder with a laser is off-patent doesn't mean you're in the clear. The "gold rush" just created a new, more complex minefield of thousands of smaller, narrower patents on:
- New metal powder compositions
- Specific laser scan strategies
- In-situ monitoring systems (watching the melt pool)
- Unique support structure geometries
- Post-processing techniques
- The software that runs it all
As a founder, an SMB owner, or a creator, you don't need to be a patent attorney. But you absolutely need to be a patent strategist. Your intellectual property (IP) is quite possibly the single most valuable asset you are building, aside from your team. Get this right, and you build a defensible, valuable company. Get it wrong... well, that $100k I "wasted" was on legal fees for a fight I could have avoided with a simple $10k strategy session upfront.
This isn't legal advice (see the giant disclaimer below). This is your operational playbook. This is the coffee-stained napkin strategy session I wish someone had given me.
First, What Is the PBF Patent Landscape, Really?
Think of the PBF patent world like this: It used to be a giant, privately-owned continent. You couldn't even set foot on it without paying a massive toll to the kings (the original patent holders).
Now, that continent is public land. But, it's covered in thousands of tiny, privately-owned plots. You can walk on the public paths, but if you step one foot onto someone's 10x10 plot, they can sue you for trespassing.
Your job is to navigate this landscape without trespassing (which we call "infringement") while simultaneously staking out your own little plots of land (your patents) on any valuable, unclaimed territory you discover.
These "tiny plots" are patents on things that seem incredibly specific, but are commercially vital:
- Material Science: You can't patent "titanium." But you can patent "A titanium alloy composition for PBF comprising 5-6% aluminum, 3-4% vanadium, and 0.1-0.5% boron, which exhibits reduced cracking during cooling."
- Process Parameters: You can't patent "using a laser to melt powder." But you can patent "A method for reducing porosity in 316L steel by oscillating the laser at a specific frequency while maintaining a specific melt pool temperature."
- Software & Design: You can't patent "support structures." But you can patent "A novel geometry for a frangible support structure that is generated by a specific algorithm and breaks away at a predictable shear force."
This is where small businesses and startups get slaughtered. You buy a machine from Company A, use powder from Company B, and run software from Company C to print a part... and suddenly you get a letter from Company D, which owns a patent on the combination of those process steps. You are infringing, and you had no idea.
A patent strategy isn't just about filing patents. It's an integrated business plan for:
- Defense: Ensuring you don't get sued into oblivion (Freedom to Operate).
- Offense: Protecting your own unique innovations to create a competitive advantage (Filing Patents).
- Value Creation: Building a portfolio of IP assets that makes your company valuable to investors and potential acquirers.
The 7-Step Metal Powder Bed Fusion Patent Strategy
Okay, deep breath. It's complex, but it's not impossible. Here is the practical, step-by-step process. Do this before you're too far down the road.
Step 1: The Internal IP Audit (What Do You Even Have?)
Before you call a lawyer, grab a notebook and your lead engineer. You need to map out your "secret sauce." What do you do that your competitors can't? Or what do you do better? Be brutally specific.
- Is it the way you orient parts on the build plate?
- Is it the post-processing heat treatment cycle you developed?
- Is it the custom "parameter set" (laser power, speed, hatch spacing) you created for that tricky new alloy?
- Is it a piece of software you wrote to automate build prep?
Put everything on this list. 90% of it won't be patentable. But you're hunting for the 10% that might be. This list is your raw material.
Step 2: The "So What?" Test (Commercial Viability)
Now, look at your list. For every item, ask two questions:
- Is it easy for a competitor to copy or reverse-engineer? (e.g., a unique part design is easy to copy. A heat treatment cycle is harder to discover.)
- If a competitor did copy it, would it seriously hurt your business?
This is your filter. If the answer to both is "YES," you have a strong candidate for IP protection. If it's easy to copy but doesn't really matter to your bottom line, who cares? If it's super valuable but impossible to reverse-engineer (like your internal company culture), it's probably a trade secret, not a patent. (More on that in a minute).
Step 3: The Prior Art Search (Don't Be "That Guy")
You think your idea is new. I promise you, someone has thought of something similar. Your job is to find it before you spend $20,000 on a patent application that gets rejected.
Go to Google Patents and the USPTO website. Spend an entire day searching. Use every keyword you can think of: "laser powder bed fusion," "selective laser melting," "support structure," "breakaway," "frangible," "scan strategy," "residual stress."
You are looking for "prior art"—any public disclosure of an idea similar to yours. If you find it, you're not dead. Your invention just has to be a non-obvious improvement over what you found. But if you find exactly your idea... congratulations, you just saved yourself a ton of money. Back to the drawing board.
Step 4: The FTO Search (This Is Non-Negotiable)
I'm giving this its own section later, but it's the most critical step. A Freedom to Operate (FTO) search doesn't ask, "Can I patent my idea?" It asks, "Can I sell my product without infringing on someone else's active patent?"
This is where you pay a professional. Do not DIY this. A patent attorney or specialized search firm will analyze your entire process—the machine, the material, the software, the part—and map it against all active patents. The report they give you will be your roadmap for avoiding lawsuits. It might say, "You're clear," or it might say, "You're 90% clear, but you must avoid using a laser spot size below 80 microns, as that's patented by Competitor X." This is pure gold.
Step 5: Choose Your Weapon (Patent vs. Trade Secret)
You have a valuable, novel idea. Now you have to decide how to protect it. This is the big strategic choice.
- File a Patent: You disclose your invention to the world in a detailed document. In exchange, the government gives you a 20-year monopoly to stop anyone else from making, using, or selling it.
- Keep it a Trade Secret: You don't tell anyone. You protect it internally with NDAs, locked doors, and secure servers. Think: the Coca-Cola formula.
We'll dive deeper in the Showdown section, but the basic rule for AM is:
- Patent things that are easy to reverse-engineer (like a finished part's design, a new machine component).
- Trade Secret things that are hard to reverse-engineer (like your "secret sauce" process parameters, your specific post-processing recipe).
Step 6: The Provisional Patent Application (Start the Clock)
You've decided to patent. Your next move isn't a full, $30k patent. It's a Provisional Patent Application (PPA).
A PPA is a relatively cheap (~$1,000-$3,000) and informal document that you file with the patent office. It's like planting a flag. It doesn't get reviewed, but it secures your "filing date." You now have 12 months to file your full, non-provisional patent.
Why do this? Because you can now publicly write "Patent Pending" on your product. You can go to trade shows, talk to investors, and sell your product without losing your right to patent it. That 12-month window is your time to test the market and see if the idea is actually worth the full patent cost.
Step 7: Build Your "Picket Fence" (The Pro-Level Strategy)
Don't file one giant, broad patent that tries to cover everything. It's too easy to challenge and invalidate.
Instead, file multiple, narrower patents that surround your core invention. This is the "picket fence."
- Patent 1: The core invention (e.g., the new support algorithm).
- Patent 2: A specific application of it (e.g., using it for medical implants).
- Patent 3: A variation of it (e.g., a second version of the algorithm).
- Patent 4: The process of using it (e.g., the method of post-processing the part).
Now, if a competitor finds a way around one of your patents, they'll just run into another. This is how you build a real defensive moat that investors love to see.
The Metal AM IP Showdown: Patent vs. Trade Secret
The Hard Truth: Why Your "Brilliant" Idea Might Be Unpatentable
This is the part of the conversation that founders hate. You've spent six months developing a new process, and the patent attorney says, "I can't file this."
To be patentable, your invention must be three things:
- Novel (New): Has anyone in the world ever publicly disclosed this before? This includes a research paper from a university in Japan, a blog post, or a presentation at a conference 10 years ago. If it's not 100% new, it's not novel.
- Useful (Utility): It has to do something. (This is the easiest one to pass in AM).
- Non-Obvious: This is the one that kills 90% of ideas. The legal standard is: Would your invention be "obvious" to a "person having ordinary skill in the art" (i.e., your average, competent engineer)?
Here’s the classic "obvious" trap in PBF:
- Your Idea: "I took the standard parameters for printing Ti-64 and I lowered the laser power by 10% and increased the scan speed by 10%. It works better!"
- The Problem: A patent examiner will say, "This is just routine optimization. Any engineer would try to 'turn the knobs' to find the best settings. This is obvious."
- A Non-Obvious Idea: "I developed a new AI-driven scan strategy where the laser path is dynamic, responding in real-time to thermal data from the melt pool to prevent stress fractures. This results in a 40% stronger part."
See the difference? One is "tinkering," the other is a new conceptual approach that solves a known problem in an unexpected way.
Freedom to Operate (FTO): Your "Permission Slip" to Even Exist
I have to hammer this home because it's the #1 way AM startups die.
Let's use an analogy.
- A Patent is a deed that says you own a piece of land (your invention).
- An FTO Search is a title search and a survey. It checks if your land is "landlocked."
Imagine you invent and patent a revolutionary new car engine. Amazing! But to sell your engine, you have to put it in a car... and it turns out someone else owns the patent on the chassis, the wheels, and the steering wheel. You have a patent, but you have no freedom to operate. You can't sell your product.
This happens every single day in PBF.
- You develop a new software to generate support structures. But the file format it exports to is proprietary and patented.
- You discover a new parameter set for a metal powder. But the powder itself is patented by another company for use in PBF systems.
- You design a new medical implant. But the process of printing it (e.g., using a specific gas flow rate to achieve purity) is patented.
The Rule: You MUST conduct an FTO search before you invest serious capital in scaling up production or launching a new product. An FTO opinion from a law firm is your "get out of jail" card. If you are ever sued for infringement, showing the court that you did your due diligence with a formal FTO opinion can be your best defense and help you avoid charges of "willful infringement," which come with triple damages.
Trade Secrets vs. Patents: The Big AM Showdown (And Why You Need Both)
This is the central business strategy question. Let's break it down in a table.
| Feature | Patent | Trade Secret |
|---|---|---|
| What is it? | A 20-year legal monopoly in exchange for full public disclosure. | Information that has commercial value because it is kept secret. |
| Cost | High. $15,000 - $30,000+ per patent, plus maintenance fees. | "Free" (in fees), but costs money to protect (NDAs, security, training). |
| Protection | Protects against everyone, even if they discover it independently. | Protects only against theft (e.g., corporate espionage, NDA breach). |
| The Catch | You must teach your competitor exactly how your invention works. | If someone reverse-engineers it or discovers it on their own, you have zero recourse. |
| Duration | 20 years from filing date. | Potentially forever (e.g., KFC's 11 herbs and spices). |
My Hybrid Strategy for PBF Startups:
You need both. This is how you win.
You PATENT your "Product":
- The final part design that has a unique, patentable feature.
- A new machine component you developed.
- A specific software algorithm.
You "TRADE SECRET" your "Process":
- Your "secret sauce" parameter set.
- Your specific 12-step post-processing workflow (e.g., stress relief at X temp for Y hours, then HIPing at Z pressure).
- Your internal know-how for supporting tricky parts.
A patent portfolio gets you funded. A book of trade secrets makes you profitable.
The 5 Most Common (and Costly) PBF IP Mistakes
I see these over and over. Avoid them.
- Talking Too Soon (Public Disclosure). You're excited. You post your new invention on LinkedIn or present it at a trade show before filing even a provisional patent. You have just destroyed your ability to get a patent in most of the world (Europe, China, Japan). In the US, you have a 12-month grace period, but don't risk it. Rule: File first, talk second.
- Forgetting FTO. (Yes, again.) You spend $1 million scaling up a new product, launch it, and *then* get the cease-and-desist letter. You're now dead in the water, and all that capital is wasted.
- Filing a "Patent on an Idea." You can't patent an abstract idea. You must patent a *tangible, specific application*.
- Bad: "A patent on using AI to improve 3D printing."
- Good: "A method for adjusting laser power in a PBF system, wherein a convolutional neural network analyzes melt pool image data to identify..."
- Hiring the Wrong Lawyer. You hire your uncle's real-estate lawyer to save a few bucks. They don't understand the difference between EBM and DMLS. They will write a terrible, useless patent. You *must* use a patent attorney or agent who has a background in mechanical engineering, materials science, or manufacturing. Ask them: "How many AM-related patents have you written?" If the answer is less than 10, walk away.
- Assuming Your Machine Purchase Covers You. You buy a $500,000 machine. That purchase gives you a license to *use that machine*. It does *not* give you a license to infringe on other people's patents *with* that machine. That risk is 100% on you.
Your Toolkit: Trusted Links & Resources
Don't just take my word for it. Your strategy must be built on real data. Here are the primary sources you or your attorney will be using. Start getting familiar with them.
Mandatory Legal Disclaimer
I am a writer and strategist with experience in the AM industry. I am not a patent attorney, and this is not legal advice. This article is for informational and educational purposes only. Patent law is incredibly complex and specific to the facts of your situation. Do not make any financial or legal decisions based solely on this article. You must consult with a qualified patent attorney registered to practice in your jurisdiction to get advice on your specific needs. Your future company depends on it.
Frequently Asked Questions (That You're Too Afraid to Ask)
What is a "metal powder bed fusion patent strategy," really?
It's your business plan for how you'll handle intellectual property. It answers questions like: What do we patent? What do we keep as a trade secret? How do we make sure we're not infringing on anyone else's patents (FTO)? And how do we use our IP to increase our company's value?
How much does it cost to patent a PBF process?
A lot. In the US, for a single, relatively complex patent (like a new PBF process), you should budget $15,000 to $30,000+ from start to finish. This includes search fees, attorney's fees for drafting, filing fees, and "prosecution" (arguing with the patent examiner). A simple provisional patent (PPA) is much cheaper, often $1,000-$3,000.
What's the difference between a patent and a trade secret for 3D printing?
A patent protects an invention you disclose (e.g., a new part design). It stops everyone from copying it. A trade secret protects valuable info you keep secret (e.g., your secret process parameters). It only protects you from theft, not from someone else figuring it out on their own. See the full showdown here.
Can I patent a 3D-printed part design?
Yes, two ways! If the part's function is new and non-obvious (e.g., a new lattice structure that improves heat exchange in a novel way), you file a utility patent. If the part's look is new and unique (e.g., an artistic, ornamental design), you can file a design patent, which is cheaper and faster to get.
What is a "Freedom to Operate" (FTO) search in additive manufacturing?
It's a professional search to determine if your product or process infringes on any active, in-force patents held by others. It is the most critical defensive step you can take. It's your "Can I get sued?" check. Read the deep dive on FTO here.
How long does a metal AM patent last?
A utility patent (the main kind) lasts for 20 years from the earliest filing date. A design patent lasts for 15 years from the date it's granted.
What was the "patent cliff" for PBF?
This refers to the period around 2014-2016 when the foundational patents on Laser PBF (held by EOS) and EBM (held by Arcam) expired. This expiration allowed dozens of new companies to enter the market, which dramatically lowered machine prices and sparked the AM boom we see today.
Is it better to patent my new metal alloy or keep it a trade secret?
This is a classic hybrid case. You should probably patent the alloy's composition (e.g., "Alloy X with 5-10% Y and 1-2% Z"). Why? Because a competitor can buy your powder, run it through a spectrometer, and discover its chemical makeup (easy to reverse-engineer). But you should keep the process of printing it as a trade secret (the parameters, temperatures, etc.).
What's the biggest mistake startups make with PBF IP?
Two mistakes are tied for first: 1) Publicly disclosing their invention before filing a provisional patent, and 2) Failing to conduct a Freedom to Operate (FTO) search before launching their product. Both are potentially company-ending mistakes.
Conclusion: Stop Guessing and Start Building Your Moat
Your metal PBF machine is a tool for building products. Your patent strategy is the blueprint for building a valuable company.
It feels overwhelming, I know. It's expensive, it's slow, and it's full of confusing legal jargon. It's tempting to just put your head down, print cool parts, and "deal with it later."
That is a terrible, terrible idea.
"Later" is when you get the cease-and-desist letter. "Later" is when you're pitching to VCs and they ask, "What's your IP position?" and you have no answer. "Later" is when your biggest competitor launches your idea because you talked about it at a trade show.
You don't have to do it all at once. Start small.
Your homework for this week is Step 1: Get your team in a room and do that internal IP audit. Just figure out what your "secret sauce" is.
Your second call isn't to a lawyer to file a patent. It's to a lawyer to commission an FTO search. Defense first. Then offense.
Your innovation is real. It's valuable. Don't let it slip through your fingers because you were too busy with the engineering to think about the strategy. Build your moat, one picket at a time.
metal powder bed fusion patent strategy, additive manufacturing IP, PBF patent landscape, FTO search additive manufacturing, 3D printing trade secrets
🔗 The 9 Dirty Little Secrets to Real Online Income (2025) Posted 2025-10-21 UTC
